Scotland West District Member's Report from Guild Council Meeting 17.6.2004



Future working of Guild Council
A major part of the away day was spent looking at the strategic plan for the next 3-5 years and considering what GHP needs to do for members and how to achieve it. It is important that GHP becomes more proactive and less reactive; although the reactive role will still be important.

back to top

Agenda for Change
A 45 minute briefing was given to Council members before the main Council meeting started. This consisted of accounts of experiences within the EI sites and the lessons learned.
It is vitally important that all sites have a GHP representative or AfC representative.



back to top

Council Meeting

Council Membership
The president welcomed four new members to their first Council meeting. Christine Gilmour and Dave Thornton are new National members; Tom Gray the new District Member for the East of England; and Graeme Richardson the new District Member for the Northern District.

Christine
Gilmour

National
Member
Tom
Gray

District Member
East of England
Graeme
Richardson

District Member
Northern
Dave
Thornton

National
Member

Council also wished the GHP Administrator, Preeti Farooki, well in her new career and thanked her for all her work for the Guild. She leaves Amicus at the end of June.

back to top

Agenda for Change
Aintree: All pharmacist posts had gone to matching panels with the exception of the Chief Pharmacist’s, which would go next week. It is hoped to assimilate for the July salary. Everyone appearing before a matching panel needed to be as prepared as possible. Small focus groups prepared a 3-4 page summary of evidence which was taken into the panel, referred to, if necessary, and presented to the panel at the end. Aintree have a local interim agreement replacing EDC and will not be paid on-call. They have created an additional pharmacist post to cover the reduction in hours under AfC.

Sunderland: A similar process for the matching panels. 6/7 pharmacist job families were identified by Whitley grade. The pharmacy had a note of the questions to be asked and wrote a script for the answers. This was vital to ensure that everything was described and the post achieved the correct banding. No assimilation date has been set. There is no EDC solution, and the department is trying to work out how to deliver an out-of-hours service. Band 8 posts will be paid for any overtime worked until the date of assimilation, on the basis that, until that date, no-one knew they would be band 8 and unable to be paid overtime.

Guys & St Thomas’: It was agreed that it was an absolute necessity that staff need to be prepared for the matching panels; using scripts if necessary. The plan had been to assimilate next week, but there were EDC problems and it had been delayed until the July salary. London weighting is also a complicating factor. Most pharmacists gain around £2,500 which wipes out any loss from EDC, but also means that there is no differential between those pharmacists providing an out-of-hours service and those who are not.

There has been no further movement on the pre-reg pharmacist profile. The whole issue of students is with the Shadow Executive

The job description is important, but it is the person specification which defines factor 2 (Knowledge and Skills) and therefore the band of the post.

The Review is due to finish by the end of July. There are no real details, but some information is drifting out. The main issue for all Amicus groups is on-call/out of hours. Some groups do lose out. These are predominantly A&C grades and managers with no clinical contact with patients. There has been a realisation that the system is biased towards clinical jobs and that, because there is no recognition of experience in the person specification, these posts come out too low.

back to top

Membership
It was noted that there were 3860 members as of last week.

back to top

Specialisation in Hospital Pharmacy
This had been one of the topics under discussion at the 33rd EAHP General Assembly in Helsinki. Specialisation would involve harmonisation of the postgraduate training of pharmacists and it is likely that by 2006 this will be a minimum standard of 3 years post degree. The EAHP outline curriculum consists of a series of tasks associated with jobs. Only those doing the jobs can use the title “Hospital Pharmacist”. The UK might decide to raise the standard for specialisation higher than this, but they cannot lower it and it may be the first step on the road to consultant. This will have ramifications for all post-graduate pharmacist training in the NHS.
It is of note that, as far as Europe is concerned, the UK has only one legislative body; there is no devolution!

Colin Rodden
18.6.04

back to top